Andrew Bates – Australian

__________

I heard Mallesons, one of the Largest Law Firms in the Country are not taking on any more Work!

__________

I require the assistance a suitable Legal Practice to Commence Legal Proceedings!

The legal matter is progressing slowly.

My time is being wasted in the Supreme Court…

I would like the Unclaimed Money. Click here for more information.

Are there any Legal Practices interested?

Below is a letter I have prepared for a Legal Practice:

__________

To Update 13.05.2026

¹Larceny, ²Embezzlement and Misappropriation.

For Lawyers, these are interesting sounding words…

How do I get to use these words?

Are there any Lawyers interested in using these words?

Any response ASIC, ASIO, AFP and the Australian Financial Sector?

More to come…

—————

For information on Bonds and the Crime click below:

01 – Information on Order Instruments

To continue, below is an ³Affidavit that has been sworn that relates to the Legal Case that is currently in the Supreme Court.

‘Peel Off’ is apparent with this system.

More information on the ⁴‘Peel Off’ system is explained in the footnote at the bottom of this page.

Below is a handout accepted by the Supreme Court relating to the Corporations Act Protections I have achieved. It is apparent there is no risk for a Law Firm to continue Legal proceedings on my behalf.

To simplify, I require a Lawyer to complete the following tasks:

1. I have been Defamed in Court. I would like this addressed.
   • I AM NOT SCHIZOPHRENIC.
     • I have Evidence from a Clinical Psychologist.
2. A Court Order to Subpoena the ASIC Registrar for all details of Bonds.
3. A Court Order to Subpoena the AFP for a historical Police Report made in 1999.
   • If required.
4. Notice of Motions I have filed to be actioned:
   • Defendants served adequately.
   • Pleadings read in my absence, with the ‘Reasonable Cause Of Action’ addressed as required by the Notice of Orders Made.
5. LITIGATE.

Just to let you know there are seven witnesses to the crime that I have called up for the Supreme Court hearings. I trust they will provide evidence. To date there has only been ONE ATTENDEE of the Seven witnesses. When the witnesses attend Court, I will be able to gather evidence as required.

I have earnt My Money Lawfully, have the Defendants?

__________

To Update 10.10.2026

The Supreme Court Case is summarily dismissed without prejudice.

• I am permitted to obtain evidence to have the case recommence.

Only ONE Defendant/Witness has bothered to go to Court when Requested.

Is the Court Operating as it should?

Is the Court Corrupt?

I understand in the United Kingdom the Directions Hearings take a Maximum of Five Weeks. To date the Directions Hearings in Australia have taken approximately Seventy Five Weeks.

Are the Australian Supreme Court Staff attempting to Steal Money?

Lawyers, below is the paperwork.

I need a Lawyer to correctly address the paperwork in the Courtroom. I do not believe this is a hard task.

Are there any Australian Lawyer’s capable of this task?

Also note there is a Legal Loop in this Legal Matter. I am finding difficult in obtaining Evidence I am permitted to request. Am I in DISRIPUTE?

Below is a Legal Loop. Is there a Way Out?

I have contacted the following Australian Government Organizations relating to the Missing Bonds:

1. Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC).
   • I have achieved Whistleblower Rights and Protections.
   • A Court Order from the Supreme Court will have Bond information, however it appears I need a Lawyer for this task.
   • I have a question for Lawyers.
     • Is a Self-Represented Litigant permitted to obtain Court Orders?
     • At Directions Hearing One, I was request to do so by The Judge.
2. Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA).
   • RBA have said contact Computershare Pty Ltd.
3. Australian Office of Financial Management (AOFM).
   • No response.
4. COMPUTERSHARE Pty Ltd.
   • Computershare have said contact Police.
     • ARE THE SHAREHOLDERS OF COMPUTERSHARE CORRUPT?
     • Has Embezzlement been committed?
     • What are the Real Names of these Shareholders?
     • It appears the Shareholders are using Fake Names. I have obtained a list from the ASIC Registry. An ASIC Company Extract search has been performed to validate this accusation.
   • Please note Computershare appears to be a Business or Company rather than an Australian Organisation.
     • Is this Legal?
     • Who was the Government employee that Authorised this process?
5. AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE (AFP).
   • Taskforce AVARUS has been implemented for Financial Crimes.
   • Perhaps Taskforce AVARUS can obtain Bond information from ASIC, Computershare and the RBA and other financial institutions?

All I would like is the Unclaimed Money. Click here for more information.

I have commenced Legal Proceedings. I need a Lawyer to assist in obtaining evidence by means of ‘Court Orders’ unless the Police would care to provide Evidence through Taskforce AVARUS.

__________

To Update 18.08.2026

Below is a link to the Statement provided to Authorities.

You may not use this Statement in the link above for a Movie or Book idea unless I give you permission in writing.

__________

Click here for more information on ASIC Whistleblower Rights and Protections.

Click here for information on the crime.

Perhaps publicity can help solve the crime. Click here for more details.

I would like the unclaimed money. Click here for more information.

1. Larceny is the legal term for the unlawful taking and carrying away of someone else’s personal property with the intent to permanently deprive the rightful owner of it. It is synonymous with theft or stealing, but it specifically requires that the property be taken without the owner’s consent. ↩︎
2. Embezzlement is a white-collar crime where a person entrusted with another’s money or assets fraudulently appropriates or steals them for their own personal gain. ↩︎
3. An affidavit is a written statement where the contents are sworn or affirmed to be true. An affidavit should set out facts, not opinion.
   Each item is addressed with a true or false answer.
   A false answer can lead to imprisonment. ↩︎
4. The defendant has responded with an affidavit that contains false information that is delaying Court proceedings. This defendant’s affidavit is frivolous and is used to cause annoyance.
   My response to the defendant’s accusations is a second affidavit that can be ‘peeled off’ to the original affidavit.
   This ‘peeling off’ system is used widely through-out the Legal arena as the affidavit demands a true or false answer.
   After ‘peeling off’ the unwanted affidavits the defendants are likely to provide with untrue information, I will be left with my original affidavit.
   This original affidavit will be used for the final Court hearing. ↩︎